Comments on: 3 types of C++ programmers http://warpedvisions.org/2007/10/09/3-types-of-c-programmers/ A technical tumblelog of links and articles on programming, design, and other geek interests Fri, 09 Jan 2009 21:54:04 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7 hourly 1 By: Steven Fisher http://warpedvisions.org/2007/10/09/3-types-of-c-programmers/comment-page-1/#comment-15325 Steven Fisher Tue, 16 Oct 2007 20:35:35 +0000 http://warpedvisions.org/2007/10/09/3-types-of-c-programmers/#comment-15325 <p>I mean the "object zen," not "grounded in reality."</p> I mean the “object zen,” not “grounded in reality.”

]]> By: Steven Fisher http://warpedvisions.org/2007/10/09/3-types-of-c-programmers/comment-page-1/#comment-15324 Steven Fisher Tue, 16 Oct 2007 20:34:42 +0000 http://warpedvisions.org/2007/10/09/3-types-of-c-programmers/#comment-15324 <p>That's an awesome way to describe it, too. :)</p> That’s an awesome way to describe it, too. :)

]]> By: mx http://warpedvisions.org/2007/10/09/3-types-of-c-programmers/comment-page-1/#comment-15318 mx Mon, 15 Oct 2007 21:18:50 +0000 http://warpedvisions.org/2007/10/09/3-types-of-c-programmers/#comment-15318 <p>There, I added a category for you: objects, but not too deep.</p> <p>You're right about the templates, I'm not sure how much of that belief is grounded in reality.</p> There, I added a category for you: objects, but not too deep.

You’re right about the templates, I’m not sure how much of that belief is grounded in reality.

]]> By: Steven Fisher http://warpedvisions.org/2007/10/09/3-types-of-c-programmers/comment-page-1/#comment-15317 Steven Fisher Mon, 15 Oct 2007 21:15:29 +0000 http://warpedvisions.org/2007/10/09/3-types-of-c-programmers/#comment-15317 <p>I'm mostly #2, although I don't think my objects are particularily deep. I prefer simplicity; depth is usually a weakness.</p> <p>I do use some low-level C code, although I'd say I'm slightly more into templates than low level C. The code you've seen has been a bit atypical, because I've been aware that I may be writing for platforms that "can't use templates." Although in retrospect, I don't think I believe that's actually true.</p> I’m mostly #2, although I don’t think my objects are particularily deep. I prefer simplicity; depth is usually a weakness.

I do use some low-level C code, although I’d say I’m slightly more into templates than low level C. The code you’ve seen has been a bit atypical, because I’ve been aware that I may be writing for platforms that “can’t use templates.” Although in retrospect, I don’t think I believe that’s actually true.

]]> By: mx http://warpedvisions.org/2007/10/09/3-types-of-c-programmers/comment-page-1/#comment-15313 mx Mon, 15 Oct 2007 04:01:43 +0000 http://warpedvisions.org/2007/10/09/3-types-of-c-programmers/#comment-15313 <p>I blend the first two most of the time these days, though I love generics (I use them, but tend not to have time to implement them).</p> <p>/me guesses that Steve is a #2 mostly, with a side of 1 and smidgen of 3.</p> I blend the first two most of the time these days, though I love generics (I use them, but tend not to have time to implement them).

/me guesses that Steve is a #2 mostly, with a side of 1 and smidgen of 3.

]]> By: Steven Fisher http://warpedvisions.org/2007/10/09/3-types-of-c-programmers/comment-page-1/#comment-15217 Steven Fisher Thu, 11 Oct 2007 20:31:33 +0000 http://warpedvisions.org/2007/10/09/3-types-of-c-programmers/#comment-15217 <p>Well, I know some who blend both of your first two styles.</p> Well, I know some who blend both of your first two styles.

]]>