<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The etymology of i, j, k, &#8230;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://warpedvisions.org/2007/12/18/the-etymology-of-i-j-k/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://warpedvisions.org/2007/12/18/the-etymology-of-i-j-k/</link>
	<description>A technical tumblelog of links and articles on programming, design, and other geek interests</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 20 Nov 2008 13:47:09 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: eldila</title>
		<link>http://warpedvisions.org/2007/12/18/the-etymology-of-i-j-k/#comment-16659</link>
		<dc:creator>eldila</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Dec 2007 18:16:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://warpedvisions.org/2007/12/18/the-etymology-of-i-j-k/#comment-16659</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;I always think about the Cartesian coordinate system when I think of i, j, and k in for loops.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;$ vec{r} = x hat{i} + y hat{j} + z hat{k} $&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Fortran makes more sense though.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I always think about the Cartesian coordinate system when I think of i, j, and k in for loops.</p>
<p>$ vec{r} = x hat{i} + y hat{j} + z hat{k} $</p>
<p>Fortran makes more sense though.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 0.310 seconds -->
