<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Foot, bullet, and maybe Apple is smarter than that?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://warpedvisions.org/2008/03/15/foot-bullet-and-maybe-apple-is-smarter-than-that/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://warpedvisions.org/2008/03/15/foot-bullet-and-maybe-apple-is-smarter-than-that/</link>
	<description>A technical tumblelog of links and articles on programming, design, and other geek interests</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 21 Nov 2008 06:38:23 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: mx</title>
		<link>http://warpedvisions.org/2008/03/15/foot-bullet-and-maybe-apple-is-smarter-than-that/#comment-17013</link>
		<dc:creator>mx</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 16 Mar 2008 17:23:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://warpedvisions.org/2008/03/15/foot-bullet-and-maybe-apple-is-smarter-than-that/#comment-17013</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Well, that's what I'm suggesting: that some subset of the event portions of background processing may already be in the works (it's at least one way to solve the problem).  If you boil down what background tasks are used for, maybe there's a more manageable subset that could be implemented without full background process support.  I can imagine a few ways at least.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;To contrast, though, the Wii doesn't allow background tasks, and the iPhone/Touch are really equivalent tools.  It's hard to provide everything in a device, and make it great.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, that&#8217;s what I&#8217;m suggesting: that some subset of the event portions of background processing may already be in the works (it&#8217;s at least one way to solve the problem).  If you boil down what background tasks are used for, maybe there&#8217;s a more manageable subset that could be implemented without full background process support.  I can imagine a few ways at least.</p>
<p>To contrast, though, the Wii doesn&#8217;t allow background tasks, and the iPhone/Touch are really equivalent tools.  It&#8217;s hard to provide everything in a device, and make it great.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ian Betteridge</title>
		<link>http://warpedvisions.org/2008/03/15/foot-bullet-and-maybe-apple-is-smarter-than-that/#comment-17012</link>
		<dc:creator>Ian Betteridge</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 16 Mar 2008 10:22:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://warpedvisions.org/2008/03/15/foot-bullet-and-maybe-apple-is-smarter-than-that/#comment-17012</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;"Full background processing is a bad idea on a quality phone/mp3 player..."
Yes - but the problem is that Apple has gone to the other extreme, and said &lt;em&gt;no&lt;/em&gt; background processes. There are ways of managing background processes which don't mean major performance impacts.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Full background processing is a bad idea on a quality phone/mp3 player&#8230;&#8221;<br />
Yes - but the problem is that Apple has gone to the other extreme, and said <em>no</em> background processes. There are ways of managing background processes which don&#8217;t mean major performance impacts.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 0.501 seconds -->
