<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Foot, bullet, and maybe Apple is smarter than that?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://warpedvisions.org/2008/03/15/foot-bullet-and-maybe-apple-is-smarter-than-that/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://warpedvisions.org/2008/03/15/foot-bullet-and-maybe-apple-is-smarter-than-that/</link>
	<description>A technical tumblelog of links and articles on programming, design, and other geek interests</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 02 Jun 2010 20:28:53 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: mx</title>
		<link>http://warpedvisions.org/2008/03/15/foot-bullet-and-maybe-apple-is-smarter-than-that/comment-page-1/#comment-17013</link>
		<dc:creator>mx</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 16 Mar 2008 17:23:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://warpedvisions.org/2008/03/15/foot-bullet-and-maybe-apple-is-smarter-than-that/#comment-17013</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Well, that&#039;s what I&#039;m suggesting: that some subset of the event portions of background processing may already be in the works (it&#039;s at least one way to solve the problem).  If you boil down what background tasks are used for, maybe there&#039;s a more manageable subset that could be implemented without full background process support.  I can imagine a few ways at least.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;To contrast, though, the Wii doesn&#039;t allow background tasks, and the iPhone/Touch are really equivalent tools.  It&#039;s hard to provide everything in a device, and make it great.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, that&#8217;s what I&#8217;m suggesting: that some subset of the event portions of background processing may already be in the works (it&#8217;s at least one way to solve the problem).  If you boil down what background tasks are used for, maybe there&#8217;s a more manageable subset that could be implemented without full background process support.  I can imagine a few ways at least.</p>

<p>To contrast, though, the Wii doesn&#8217;t allow background tasks, and the iPhone/Touch are really equivalent tools.  It&#8217;s hard to provide everything in a device, and make it great.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ian Betteridge</title>
		<link>http://warpedvisions.org/2008/03/15/foot-bullet-and-maybe-apple-is-smarter-than-that/comment-page-1/#comment-17012</link>
		<dc:creator>Ian Betteridge</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 16 Mar 2008 10:22:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://warpedvisions.org/2008/03/15/foot-bullet-and-maybe-apple-is-smarter-than-that/#comment-17012</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;&quot;Full background processing is a bad idea on a quality phone/mp3 player...&quot;
Yes - but the problem is that Apple has gone to the other extreme, and said &lt;em&gt;no&lt;/em&gt; background processes. There are ways of managing background processes which don&#039;t mean major performance impacts.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Full background processing is a bad idea on a quality phone/mp3 player&#8230;&#8221;
Yes &#8211; but the problem is that Apple has gone to the other extreme, and said <em>no</em> background processes. There are ways of managing background processes which don&#8217;t mean major performance impacts.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
